Ashton Bowers vs Alexis Nguyen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bowers vs Nguyen analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashton Bowers vs Alexis Nguyen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bowers 1 - 0 Nguyen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bowers has won 46.75% of points on his second serve, while Nguyen has won 41.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bowers, in recent form, has won 55.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nguyen has won 53.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.24% and 39.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bowers has saved 52.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nguyen has saved 36.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bowers has won 52.78% of matches played (W/L 19/ 17), with Nguyen winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bowers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Nguyen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Bowers has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11), where as Nguyen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 11/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bowers winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bowers winning 2 and Nguyen winning 0. The last match between Bowers and Nguyen was at the W15 Norman, 02-11-2023, Second, I.hard with Ashton Bowers getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bowers and Nguyen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bowers winning 0 times and Nguyen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bowers winning 0, and Nguyen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bowers has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.33 while Nguyen has played against players with an average rank of 84.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bowers has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nguyen has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bowers has converted 42.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nguyen has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ashton Bowers
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
729
Rank
729
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
Alexis Nguyen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
50% (19-19)
Career Total W/L
54% (13-11)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ashton Bowers | Alexis Nguyen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (36/54) | 71% (29/41) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (25/36) | 45% (13/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 17% (2/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 63% (26/41) | 37% (20/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Alexis Nguyen
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ashton Bowers | Alexis Nguyen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 0% (0/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (32/28) | 14% (1/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (281/255) | 40% (29/43) |
Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 56 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 105 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 237.23 | 310 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1087/1763) | 47% (82/173) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (665/1087) | 62% (51/82) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (316/676) | 42% (38/91) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (109/256) | 50% (10/20) |
Return Pts W% | 47% (880/1878) | 43% (73/170) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/3) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (2/0) |
Ashton Bowers Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Ashton Bowers
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Ashton Bowers
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
51 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Adriana Reami
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
127)
1
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
52 of
87)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
127)
109
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Ashton Bowers
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ashton Bowers
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Liv Hovde
Player
Ashton Bowers
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Maya Joint
Player
Ashton Bowers
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Alexis Nguyen Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Alexis Nguyen
78%
(
91 of
116)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
110)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Katrina Scott
Player
Alexis Nguyen
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
43%
(
27 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Alexis Nguyen
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Maria Florencia Urrutia
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
16
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
59 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(3) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Anne Christine Lutkemeyer Obregon
Player
Alexis Nguyen
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Katie Codd
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more